Skip to Content

An Important Announcement
We are excited to announce the long-awaited Duotrope community! Create your profile, high five your fellow creators, and journey along Rejection Road.

About Duotrope's Statistics on Publishing Projects and Agents

A grouping of colorful umbrellas suspended in the air. (Photo by Alejando Garrido Navarro.)
Statistics can show you a publication's true colors. Photo by Alejandro Garrido Navarro.

About our Statistics

Duotrope takes great pride in the statistics we show on our publisher and agent listings. We've spent countless hours refining how we collate and present that data to you, so that it provides useful, meaningful information at a glance without bogging you down in too much detail. (Because we want to help you navigate the submission process as quickly as possible, so you can get right back to creating.)

How we gather the data

All the data is taken from reports from our subscribers through our Submission Tracker/Submission Reporter or through submissions sent through Duosuma, our submission manager (if the submitter is a subscriber or opted in to share the data with Duotrope). The data is never provided by or altered by Duotrope or by the editors/agents. It is 100% user reported.

Statistics Synopsis

If we have enough submission reports for this listing within the past 12 months, the listing will have a Statistics Synopsis section that looks something like this:

Statistics Synopsis

Faster
Duopolis Review's overall average response time is faster than most magazines.
More Challenging
Duopolis Review's overall acceptance rate is lower than most magazines.
More Responsive
Duopolis Review's overall rate of non-response is lower than most magazines.

The speed section will show if we have at least 3 submission reports for the past 12 months. It will indicate whether the project is stastistically:

  • Slower,
  • Faster, or
  • Regular Speed (within the average response speed range).

If we have at least 10 submission reports for the past 12 months, it will also have an acceptance rate and responsiveness section.

The acceptance rate section will indicate whether the project is statistically:

  • More Approachable (has a higher acceptance rate than most),
  • More Challenging (has a lower acceptance rate than most), or
  • Normal Acceptance (falls within the average acceptance range).

The responsiveness section will show whether the the project is statistically:

  • More Responsive,
  • Less Responsive, or
  • Responsive (falls within the average range of non-resposiveness).

Note that for this purpose, "non-responsive" includes submissions reported as "never responded" or "lost," but it does not include submissions withdrawn by the author.

These comparisons are against our current statistics for all active projects of the same type (journal/press/contest/agent/etc), which we compile daily. Also, these statistcs include submission reports across all categories, except for outliers.

Charts

Submission Statistics Charts are shown on the Listing of the Day for everyone, and are available to our subscribers on all active listings that have enough submission reports.
Sign up today!

Here is an example of what our submission statistics charts look like and how to read them (for a live example, see the Listing of the Day):

The Pie chart shows the types of response by percentage. In this example: 90% of the submissions were Rejected, 5% Accepted, 3% Withdrawn by the author, 1% Lost, and 1% Never Responded.

The Range chart shows the Minimum, Maximum, and (mean) Average of each type of response. The average is marked by a white diamond (which can also hint at the distribution). In this example:

  • Pending submissions range from 0 to 90 days, with an average wait time of 15 days.
  • Submitters have Withdrawn their submissions at between 0 to 45 days, with an average of 20 days.
  • Rejections have been received from 5 to 90 days, with an average of 60 days.
  • Acceptances have been sent from 75 and 115 days, with an average of 80 days.
  • A submission was reported "Lost" at 175 days, and another submission was reported "Never Responded" at 180 days.*

Conclusions you can draw from that example: The editors typically respond quickly with rejections and hold on longer before sending acceptances (possibly due to additional review).

* Always take the times for "Lost" and "Never Responded" submissions with a large grain of salt, since the submitter decides when to give up. Also, an editor's timely response may become lost forever in someone's spam folder, so it only shows that a response wasn't received, not necessarily that a response wasn't sent.

Submission Statistics Details

Submission Statistics Details are shown on the Listing of the Day for everyone, and are available to our subscribers on all active listings that have enough submission reports.
Sign up today!

Here is a sample of the details provided (for a live example, see the Listing of the Day):

Accuracy
We have received 217 reports from 208 different members within the past 12 months. The more responses reported, the more accurate the information.
Days Reported
29 min | 102.6 mean avg | 115.0 median | 344 max days (143.6 std dev)
Responses
95.85 %
Acceptances:
2.30 % of submissions accepted (103.0 avg. days per acceptance) | 2.40 % of submitters accepted Rejections are often underreported, which skews the statistics in favor of acceptances. Most publishers have a lower acceptance rate than indicated here.
Rejections:
93.55 % (101.1 avg. days per rejection) | 9.4 % personal, 69.5 % form, 21.2 % unspecified
Non-Responses
0.46 %
Lost/Returned:
-
Never Responded:
0.46 % (180.0 avg. days before reporting submissions as never responded)
Withdrawals
3.69 % (47.0 avg. days per withdrawal)

On the Accuracy of Self-Reporting

Although we encourage all people who report their submission responses to be as honest and complete as possible, as with all statistics gathered from human reporting, there is a significant margin of error. We do everything possible to make sure that, when the statistics are compiled, they present as accurate a picture as possible. The two ways we do this are through Grouping and Outliers.

To Group or Not to Group?

By default, the statistics are Grouped by submission. This means that if someone submitted five poems at one time to a publisher, that is counted as one submission, instead of counting each piece submitted individually. We find that the data is cleaner and the statistics more accurate when grouped this way.

It's not unusual for different pieces in a single submission to have different outcomes. For example, an author may have withdrawn two pieces in a submission before receiving a response on the remaining three, or an author may have had one poem accepted and the other four declined. In these cases, to determine the status of the submission as a whole, we use the following hierarchy:

  • If any piece was accepted, the submission as whole is considered an Acceptance.
  • If any piece was rejected (and there are no pieces accepted), the submission is considered a Rejection.
  • If any piece is still pending a response (with no piece accepted or rejected), the submission is considered Pending (and is counted in the Pending submissions section and not in the completed submissions section).
  • If any piece was reported as lost or returned (and no piece is accepted, rejected, or pending), the submission is considered Lost/Returned.
  • If any piece was reported "never responded" (and no piece is accepted, rejected, lost, or pending), the submission is considered Never Responded.
  • If all pieces were withdrawn by the submitter, the submission is considered Withdrawn.

Don't want to group? If you simply uncheck the "Group by submission" box and click the "Display" button, it will show you the statistics calculated with each piece submitted counted individually.

About Outliers

Duotrope uses a sophisticated algorithm developed over the course of years to determine which data points are statistical outliers. By default, that data is excluded in the statistics to give a clearer picture, but you can choose to include it by checking the "Include outliers" box. (If that option isn't provided, that means that there aren't any outliers for that listing.) Learn more about how we identify outliers.


Have a question? Ask us!

Cookie Consent: This site uses secure first-party cookies for essential, preference-setting, and statistical purposes. We do not use any marketing, advertising, or third-party cookies. Read our full cookie policy.