Sugar House Review About Sugar House Review is an independent, 501(c)(3) nonprofit poetry publisher based out of Utah. Our mission is to promote an eclectic range of poets through publishing and live events to build nationally connected literary communities and foster the literary arts in Utah. We are excited to be some of the first people to see your work and to help the best of that work become available to a larger audience.Sugar House Review was founded in 2009 by John Kippen, Nano Taggart, Jerry VanIeperen, and Natalie Young. At the time, it was the only independent, print poetry journal in Utah. Our name is based on both our location and desire to publish sticky, heart-racing, sweet, sweet addictive poetry. Sugar House is a neighborhood within Salt Lake City, named after the sugar beet factory of the Deseret Manufacturing Company (1851–1855). Fees Notice: This project charges fees (or requires purchases) for some submissions. They charge fees for post-quota and fast-track submissions, except for "sugar suites" and book reviews. The fee is USD $3.75 (average for magazines that charge). Important: They accept submissions from subscribers year-round. Submission Caps: They may close to free submissions if they reach their quota. Country of Publication & Year Established United States Established in 2009 Publication Media & Frequency Electronic Publication Electronic PublicationPublished 1 x per yearPrint Publication Print PublicationPublished 1 x per year AI Policy Unknown AI policy Statistics Synopsis Regular Speed Sugar House Review's overall average response time is within a normal range for magazines. Normal AcceptanceSugar House Review's overall acceptance rate is within a normal range for magazines. More ResponsiveSugar House Review's overall rate of non-response is lower than most magazines. Poetry Open We want to publish work with energy and surprise. We look for eclectic swatches of style, tone, subject, and form, representative of the varied voices that comprise contemporary poetry.Poetry is more vibrant than ever due to the positive action taken by historically underserved groups like CantoMundo, Cave Canem, Kundiman, the Lambda Foundation, and others, working to make sure everyone has a seat at the table.We aim to be an inclusive magazine that represents this vibrancy. Help us achieve that—send us your best.Dates:Open to poetry submissions through 30 September 2026* (approx. 24 days from now).9Audience:Open to a broad Audience.Genres: GeneralLengths: Poem: No line limits known; Up to 5 pieces.Poetry Forms:Open to all/most Forms, including: Experimental poetry, Formal verse, Narrative poetry. Excluding: Light verse.Styles:Open to all/most Styles, including: Literary.Topics: Open to all/most Topics.Payment:No monetary payment Provides free copy/copies No monetary payment. Provides free copy/copies.Submissions:Method: Submittable submission manager. Reprints: Reprints are NOT allowed.Simultaneous submissions: Simultaneous submissions are allowed.Media: Audio. Image. Text. Video. Always check guidelines for details and restrictions. If you aren't familiar with these terms, see our glossary.* We do not know the time and/or timezone, so we cannot be more precise. Submit early to avoid disappointment. Go to publication's website Report: Submission/Response Correction/Update New Cover ArtSocial:Bluesky @sugarhousereview.bsky.socialFacebook FacebookX (Twitter) @sugarhouserev Support this Publisher: Make a Donation Purchase Issue(s) For the Editor(s): Request Interview Duosuma Submission Manager Link to Duotrope Sugar House Review Submission Statistics The statistics in this section are compiled from submission reports sent to us through our submission tracker. They are not provided by the publication's editors/staff or by Duotrope's admins. Information in this section is updated a few times per day. Learn more about the statistics. Filter: Category: Group by submission Include outliers Accuracy We have received 111 reports from 95 different members within the past 12 months, not including pending responses (see below). The more responses reported, the more accurate the information. Days Reported 3 min | 61.3 mean avg | 56.0 median | 131 max days (27.5 std dev) Responses 96.40 % Acceptances: 10.81 % of submissions accepted (55.3 avg. days per acceptance) | 11.58 % of submitters accepted Rejections are often underreported, which skews the statistics in favor of acceptances. Most publishers have a lower acceptance rate than indicated here. Rejections: 85.59 % (61.9 avg. days per rejection) | 2.1 % personal, 66.3 % form, 31.6 % unspecified Non-Responses 0.00 % Lost/Returned: - Never Responded: - Withdrawals 3.60 % (58.3 avg. days per withdrawal) Pending 22 responses are pending (1 min | 32.2 mean avg | 38.0 median | 96 max days waiting | 511.4 std dev) from 22 different members This only includes pending reports from people who have been active on Duotrope within the past 30 days Other Information The editors will try to make a decision within 180 days. Do not query on the status of your submission before 180 days have passed. The most common submission fee paid: USD $3.75. (52.9 % of reports specified whether they paid a fee; of those, 85.2 % paid fees.) Most submissions are acknowledged on the same day. Most recent response reported was received on 28 Aug 2026. Responses have been received for submissions sent as recently as 27 Jul 2026. Date compiled: 07 Sep 2026 00:55 UTC (3 hours, 41 minutes ago). View report of recent responses from this project Work submitted here was also submitted to...This section is available to subscribers only. Sign up and start your free trial today!Members accepted here also had work accepted by...This section is available to subscribers only. Become a member and start your free trial today! Your Submissions This section is available to subscribers only. Join today! Before SubmittingWe cannot guarantee that the information on this page is correct. It is not unusual for publications to evolve or close without notice. We do our best to keep up, but it isn't always possible. Duotrope listings do not imply endorsement or recommendation of the project being listed. Before submitting, you should use your own judgment to determine whether the project meets your standards.Always read the full guidelines provided by the publisher.Try to read at least one previous publication to get a better idea of what the editor would like to see.Unless the publisher's guidelines state otherwise, always use industry standard manuscript formatting.Be professional, patient, and persistent. DatesLast Updated: 30 Aug 2026We check their guidelines for changes every four weeks, and we audit the listing twice a year. Cookie Consent: This site uses secure first-party cookies for essential, preference-setting, and statistical purposes. We do not use any marketing, advertising, or third-party cookies. Read our full cookie policy. Accept All Cookies Allow Essential Cookies Only