Skip to Content

An Important Announcement
We are excited to announce the long-awaited Duotrope community! Create your profile, high five your fellow creators, and journey along Rejection Road.

Editor Interview: The London Journal

Describe what you publish in 25 characters or less.

London history, geography

What sets your publication apart from others that publish similar material?

We are a truly interdisciplinary journal, drawing on history, geography, literary studies, planning, archaeology, art history and many others. We aim to bring academic research and discussion into the public realm so that everyone interested in London can find something to engage with.

What is the best advice you can give people who are considering submitting work to your publication?

Read articles published in the last few years to get a flavour for what we publish (we have some permanently open access articles). If you are not sure whether your work is of interest, ask me!
If you are a Phd student or early career researcher, consider entering our annual Curriers' Company prize to win £1000 and priority publication.

Describe the ideal submission.

The ideal submission is around 8000 words, has a strong and clear argument which can be followed by readers who are not experts in the field, is lively and fluent, opens up discussion, is based on primary research or a strong analysis of secondary literature, pays attention to recent literature in the field, includes attractive images or well set-out tables and has a captivating title!

What do submitters most often get wrong about your submissions process?

They don't read our guidelines!

How much do you want to know about the person submitting to you?

We don't have cover letters, all submissions are made electronically. An article lives or dies by its own merits; we're as happy to publish someone's first article as their hundredth.

If you publish writing, how much of a piece do you read before making the decision to reject it?

Every piece is read to the end as there might be some fantastic arguments buried within an otherwise plodding narrative which we can help to tease out.

What additional evaluations, if any, does a piece go through before it is accepted?

Double blind peer review with, sometimes, ongoing dialogue between the editor in charge, reviewers and the author

What is a day in the life of an editor like for you?

All submissions come into our electronic management system. I scan through the piece quickly to see that it fits our aims and scope and to work out which editorial committee member is best placed to be in charge of it. I then assign the submission to that person and they find two reviewers who review it blind. The process does require a lot of chasing and sometimes new reviewers need to be found as the original choices don't in the end file a review. I spend a while with each paper towards the end, making sure they are polished enough to merit publication.

Cookie Consent: This site uses secure first-party cookies for essential, preference-setting, and statistical purposes. We do not use any marketing, advertising, or third-party cookies. Read our full cookie policy.