You are not logged in. You need to log in
to access this feature. Sign up
if you haven't already. All new accounts start with a free trial.
Read all the editors' answers to Duotrope's interview question: What additional evaluations, if any, does a piece go through before it is accepted? Learn more.
Here is a small sampling from our recent Editor Interviews. We have interviewed over 1,775 editors.
Q: What additional evaluations, if any, does a piece go through before it is accepted?
A: Both co-editors have to agree on a piece of work.
A: There's really no accounting for taste.
A: Stories that have impressed at least two of our readers then go to a monthly editorial meeting for discussion.
A: Poems that are accepted are read by several editors, the Managing Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief. Poems are also read by our Art Editor. All art that is accepted is evaluated by the Art Editor, the Managing Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief. All accepted pieces are discussed in depth by the entire team.
A: We trust our contributors and if they say that something is finished, we treat is as such. Of course, we do have a team of readers that go through the piece before publication to make sure that no minor, unintended errors of grammar or formatting exist. If there is a more substantive comment, we always discuss it with the contributor himself/herself and always expect his/her consent before changing anything.
A: I do the first read-through of all submissions. From there, the pieces I don’t reject I forward along to the relevant editor to make the final call.
A: Just a single read from my co-editor and I. We write down our "Yes" and "No" picks separately and then come together for a meeting. It's great when we agree, but then we have discussions on ones where we differ in opinion and eventually come to a final decision. I've been known to reread sections of a piece that we aren't sure about, but never the entire piece more than once during the submissions phase.
A: None. That said, we have an internal rule that if we find more than 3 glaring typos, we have the option to stop reading. We don't want to spend more time with your writing than you did.
A: We carefully select the best work first, and if we have identified more work than we can possibly include, we refine our selections further.
A: Triple-blind review.
A: Annual contest has a judging panel for finalists. Editor-in-chief makes all final decisions.
A: We put together issues, and sometimes it comes down to which pieces would fit into the issue we’re already building. However, we do accept for future issues if a piece really stands out but doesn’t fit in the latest upcoming issue.