Editor Interviews

Members' Area: You are not logged in. You need to log in to access this feature. Sign up if you haven't already. All new accounts start with a free trial.

Read all the editors' answers to Duotrope's interview question: What do submitters most often get wrong about your submissions process? Learn more.

Free Preview

Here is a small sampling from our recent Editor Interviews. We have interviewed over 1,600 editors.

Q: What do submitters most often get wrong about your submissions process?

A: In the digital era, we are seeing a proliferation of spontaneous, raw "cellphone" poetry which needs more thought and work by writers. Instant gratification and catharsis are not good for literature and, in our opinion, have a destructive impact on the quality of literature, language and thought. Also, some will send their entire body of work rather than a few poems or simultaneous submissions they will later withdraw.

A: They do not research our niche well enough and submit stories with no mention of climate change. That's an autoreject, no matter how well written the story.

A: We read blind. We read each submission without having any idea of the background or identification of the submitter. We ask that people refrain from placing their names or identifying information on their files or documents. Also, we reserve the option of placing a submission in the next or future issue.

Robbin Farr and Judith Lagana, Founders and co-editors of River Heron Review, 14 September 2018

A: Submitting too much, or pieces that are too long. We rarely publish longer CNF, so that we can include more writers. I love when writers submit one, solid gold piece that they have poured their heart into. It shows a dedication to themselves, and it makes me want to give them the opportunity if the work holds value.

A: Believe they can email us every other day to learn their status. Bad idea.

Mark Antony Rossi, Editor in Chief of Ariel Chart, 07 September 2018

A: Since we are a blind peer review journal, submitters must be careful to remove all personal identification from their papers so they can be sent to a referee. Submitters should also take care to make sure they are contributing something new to the field, not just rehashing an article we published years ago.

Janet Brennan Croft, Editor of Mythlore, 07 September 2018

A: Sending work too early. On a more pedestrian note, we do not hold writing contests. Each year, we do award four monetary prizes to pieces that have already been accepted into the journal's latest edition. So, don't ask for contest guidelines.

Matthew Pitt, Editor-in-chief of Descant, 05 September 2018

A: Nothing, as far as I know

Chirstoph Pieper, Editor-in-chief of Mnemosyne, 05 September 2018

A: We haven't seen anything overtly "wrong" yet. As writers, we're all trying our best, and we recognize that in our submitters, too.

A: Not following guidelines and not meeting deadlines are the most common sins.

A: They don't read our guidelines!

A: Omitting a bio and/or an address.

Lee Gould, Editor of La Presa, 21 August 2018