Skip to Content

An Important Announcement
We are excited to announce the long-awaited Duotrope community! Create your profile, high five your fellow creators, and journey along Rejection Road.

Editor Interview: Setu

This interview is provided for archival purposes. The listing is not currently active.

Describe what you publish in 25 characters or less.

Life-affirming content.

What other current publications (or publishers) do you admire most?

Spillwords.
Muse India.
Kitaab.
Confluence: south Asian perspectives.
The Statesman.
Scarlet Leaf Review.
Queen Mob's Teahouse.
The Blue Nib.
Every Day Poems.
Dissident Voice.
Cafe Dissensus.
Cold Noon.

If you publish writing, who are your favorite writers? If you publish art, who are your favorite artists?

Rob Harle.
Scott Thomas Outlar.
Kelli J Gavin.
Padmaja Iyengar-Paddy
Gopal Lahiri.
J.S. Sarangi.
Abu Siddik.
Subash Chandra.
Rana Pratap Gill.
K.S. Mani Mani.
B.S. Tyagi.
Sanjeev Sethi.

What sets your publication apart from others that publish similar material?

The bilingual journal (Hindi, English) ensures a welcoming home for the serious writings from across the world without sounding snooty, elitist or bit patronizing. The aim is to include liberal-democratic voices; promote pluralism and diversity in a divided world of politics.
Try to involve some of the happening authors as guest editors as well.
And publish many good returning authors without sacrificing quality.

What is the best advice you can give people who are considering submitting work to your publication?

---Please carefully read the guidelines.
Non-compliance leads to summary rejection.
---Send error-free, print-ready, wholesome content.
---Well-crafted pieces get an edge.
---Language-flow important.
---Fiction must be well delivered.

Describe the ideal submission.

---The one conforming to the guidelines and vision of the journal.
---One providing epiphanies most preferred.
---Form-content dialectics, must.
---Narcissism---big No.
---Social conscience---big Yes.

What do submitters most often get wrong about your submissions process?

Many, in hurry, ignore guidelines.
Improper formatting.
The indifference to guiding framework does not impress the edit team.
They must respect the rules of engagement, like true professionals.

How much do you want to know about the person submitting to you?

A brief account enough---not the intros that are longer than their submissions!
For us, current content should speak for itself, not the previous credits.

If you publish writing, how much of a piece do you read before making the decision to reject it?

In entirety.
Many pieces might begin bit late but pick up speed mid-way.
And vice versa.
Good start, then losing steam.
So, in totality, we evaluate.

What additional evaluations, if any, does a piece go through before it is accepted?

Peer review by editors.
In case of some perceptional difference, the same is referred to the editor-in-chief and one senior-most editor, for their views.
Once consensus reached, it is approved for publication.

What is a day in the life of an editor like for you?

The reading is done in the evenings, as most are working professionals, employed in varied sectors of economies of their respective countries.
We do this as a service.
Sundays for mutual edit consultations.

How much do you edit an accepted piece prior to publication?

Minor edits, in some cases---with approval from their authors.

Do you nominate work you've published for any national or international awards?

We plan to do that soon.

Cookie Consent: This site uses secure first-party cookies for essential, preference-setting, and statistical purposes. We do not use any marketing, advertising, or third-party cookies. Read our full cookie policy.